kalboy wrote:
This is one reason I like the cheap ol' single barrels, when you open one up the rd( fired or not) is launched clear. Makes for quicker reloads.
Your earlier comment about wanting a double with extractors got me thinking right along these lines. To take it a little further, what is your take on the following?:
I have only two single-shot shotguns - a .410 and a 12 gauge. These were my first two firearms and I have had both for in excess of twenty years. If broken open while still shouldered, both of them will launch an empty hull back over my shoulder and beyond. At one time, both were left sitting, empty and unfired, for years. When I decided to get them out and use them some, with only a little light oiling, both fired just as well as when they were NIB. With some minor attention with Hoppes and a fine steel wool pad, both looked like almost new, too. Having seen the Clint Smith video (I posted it somewhere on the forum) of him demonstrating how to run a single for SD/HD, I tried it out myself and was pleasantly surprised at how well it seems that would work.
Now, I have a Maverick 12 gauge pump with a 20 inch barrel and seven-round mag tube for my main HD shotgun. However, I have given some consideration to picking up a double (particularly a coach gun) or a few more single-shots as backup/emergency/stash in other locations around the house or even a sometimes truck/trunk gun. My initial gut feeling was that a double might be better but, with Kalboy's comment, I am thinking that might not necessarily be so.
In the same video mentioned, above, I believe that Clint Smith also shows how to run a double. In order to quickly 'eject' the empties, he raises the stock a bit from his shoulder and gives a quick, backward 'jerk' to the gun. This requires unshouldering the shotgun. With the single, the stock can stay in place on the shoulder as the ejector throws the empty free. The process of 'jerking' the double also adds another step/movement to reloading and requires that the muzzle be re-oriented to the target almost from scratch. Finally, it would seem a bit less clumsy under stress to grab one round and shove it into a single barrel rather than trying to load two rounds into two barrels. Maybe only a slight difference but still a difference. Granted that the initial load of two rounds in a double could be an advantage over a single shot in many situations - and given that two rounds from a shotgun just might be enough to solve most situations without the need of a quick reload - if the situation did require a sustained rate of fire of, say, four or five rounds is it not possible that the single would actually be able to accomplish this faster while being much less expensive than a double? I'm thinking of a situation where the threat might be a group of aggressive dogs, multiple human assailants or even a single, tougher critter like a bear in a camping situation (black bear in this area.) Thoughts?
My two current single-shots will not be used as 'stash' or truck/trunk guns because of their sentimental value. Also, it is sometimes hard to find good deals on singles around here with older, used singles sometimes costing nearly as much as used pumps and sometimes more that a brand-new single (I once asked the owner of my favorite LGS why even somewhat beat-up singles were so expensive at pawnshops, flea markets, etc. and he told me that many folks in this area like the older singles for bird guns and that is why their relative cost is so high around here - he said that they often aren't as popular, or as expensive, in other parts of the country.) However, at a gun show a few months ago there was one dealer selling some 'as-is' singles in various cosmetic conditions at a price of 3 for $89. If I hadn't bought the Winchester .22 semiauto rifle (from the same dealer), three of those would have come home with me with exactly such usage in mind.